<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for GTDInbox -- Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.gtdinbox.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.gtdinbox.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:46:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on GTDInbox 3.0.20.2 &#8211; Please Update! by AndyM</title>
		<link>http://blog.gtdinbox.com/2010/03/12/gtdinbox-3-0-20-2-please-update/comment-page-1/#comment-5575</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gtdinbox.com/?p=372#comment-5575</guid>
		<description>Thanks for reporting that, I hadn&#039;t noticed the behaviour. (Although I had noticed that if you archive the last message in the inbox, the new last message does not immediately have a magnifying glass, and I think they&#039;re related). I&#039;ve added it to the bug list with medium priority, and expect it to be fixed by the end of March.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for reporting that, I hadn&#8217;t noticed the behaviour. (Although I had noticed that if you archive the last message in the inbox, the new last message does not immediately have a magnifying glass, and I think they&#8217;re related). I&#8217;ve added it to the bug list with medium priority, and expect it to be fixed by the end of March.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GTDInbox 3.0.20.2 &#8211; Please Update! by Ste</title>
		<link>http://blog.gtdinbox.com/2010/03/12/gtdinbox-3-0-20-2-please-update/comment-page-1/#comment-5556</link>
		<dc:creator>Ste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gtdinbox.com/?p=372#comment-5556</guid>
		<description>Hi,
unfortunately the problem of new emails not properly recognized persists even in 3.0.20.2. It happens that, when a new mail arrives, the magnifying glass on the right is not present, and right click on that mail produces a blank GTDInbox popup window. No red error box systematically present in these cases.
Thanks in advance, 
RQ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
unfortunately the problem of new emails not properly recognized persists even in 3.0.20.2. It happens that, when a new mail arrives, the magnifying glass on the right is not present, and right click on that mail produces a blank GTDInbox popup window. No red error box systematically present in these cases.<br />
Thanks in advance,<br />
RQ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GTDInbox 3.0.12 by AndyM</title>
		<link>http://blog.gtdinbox.com/2010/02/10/gtdinbox-3-0-12/comment-page-1/#comment-5546</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gtdinbox.com/?p=324#comment-5546</guid>
		<description>Hi James, 

The key features remain in tact (e.g. GTD labeling), and of course, with Gmail you can still search on your Status and Project labels even on mobile/offline. So for following your workflow it will continue to work. It&#039;s really the sidebar and pre-labeling that is lost in Offline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi James, </p>
<p>The key features remain in tact (e.g. GTD labeling), and of course, with Gmail you can still search on your Status and Project labels even on mobile/offline. So for following your workflow it will continue to work. It&#8217;s really the sidebar and pre-labeling that is lost in Offline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GTDInbox 3.0.20.2 &#8211; Please Update! by AndyM</title>
		<link>http://blog.gtdinbox.com/2010/03/12/gtdinbox-3-0-20-2-please-update/comment-page-1/#comment-5545</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gtdinbox.com/?p=372#comment-5545</guid>
		<description>Thanks Narasimhan, I&#039;ll get it fixed up for the next release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Narasimhan, I&#8217;ll get it fixed up for the next release.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GTDInbox 3.0.20.2 &#8211; Please Update! by Narasimhan</title>
		<link>http://blog.gtdinbox.com/2010/03/12/gtdinbox-3-0-20-2-please-update/comment-page-1/#comment-5542</link>
		<dc:creator>Narasimhan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gtdinbox.com/?p=372#comment-5542</guid>
		<description>Hi,

In the last bunch of releases, including the latest, the pre-labeling does not work reliably. At the times when it doesnt work, I notice the red errors box.

regards
Narasimhan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>In the last bunch of releases, including the latest, the pre-labeling does not work reliably. At the times when it doesnt work, I notice the red errors box.</p>
<p>regards<br />
Narasimhan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GTDInbox 3.0.12 by James C.</title>
		<link>http://blog.gtdinbox.com/2010/02/10/gtdinbox-3-0-12/comment-page-1/#comment-5537</link>
		<dc:creator>James C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 23:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gtdinbox.com/?p=324#comment-5537</guid>
		<description>Hey,
As far as I&#039;m concerned this is a killer for GTDInbox. :-(
I use my Gmail account offline about half of the time, so if none of the features are there when I&#039;m on a train or plane then there is little point in developing a dependence on them - shame!
Hope that Google sort this out soon, as GTD is otherwise fantastic! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,<br />
As far as I&#8217;m concerned this is a killer for GTDInbox. <img src='http://blog.gtdinbox.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I use my Gmail account offline about half of the time, so if none of the features are there when I&#8217;m on a train or plane then there is little point in developing a dependence on them &#8211; shame!<br />
Hope that Google sort this out soon, as GTD is otherwise fantastic! <img src='http://blog.gtdinbox.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GTDInbox 3.0.20 with better support for other addons by Craig</title>
		<link>http://blog.gtdinbox.com/2010/03/11/gtdinbox-3-0-20-with-better-support-for-other-addons/comment-page-1/#comment-5507</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gtdinbox.com/?p=368#comment-5507</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to say thanks for working quickly on the recent problems! Really appreciate it as I have found myself coming to rely upon GTDInbox!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to say thanks for working quickly on the recent problems! Really appreciate it as I have found myself coming to rely upon GTDInbox!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on GTDInbox 3.0.20 with better support for other addons by Ewg</title>
		<link>http://blog.gtdinbox.com/2010/03/11/gtdinbox-3-0-20-with-better-support-for-other-addons/comment-page-1/#comment-5504</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gtdinbox.com/?p=368#comment-5504</guid>
		<description>Hi!
Boys, may you add in FF plugin coloring settings? Because.....because The reading white text on the white bacground is a very-very bad idea.
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!<br />
Boys, may you add in FF plugin coloring settings? Because&#8230;..because The reading white text on the white bacground is a very-very bad idea.<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Methodology: What is an &#8220;Action&#8221;? by Random</title>
		<link>http://blog.gtdinbox.com/2010/02/26/methodology-what-is-an-action/comment-page-1/#comment-5345</link>
		<dc:creator>Random</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gtdinbox.com/?p=347#comment-5345</guid>
		<description>(NOTE: most of this post is just background or rational, you can safely skip to the last paragraph for the important part)

I have to disagree with the first poster, zalkind, in that every email that comes into the Inbox is an Action -- you have to open it and read it, then decide how to categorize it, archive it or delete it, THAT is an action.  More on this in a minute . . .

When I first started using GTDInbox a little over two years ago, there was no &#039;Next Action&#039; label.  Instead, Next Actions were indicated by use of the Star.  I found this to be very convenient and intuitive -- the star is easy to add and remove (even from the Inbox), it is very visible, and, in keeping with the point of the star in the first place, it readily indicates the important nature of the email or it&#039;s contents.

To me, both &#039;Action&#039; and &#039;Next Action&#039; have an important and distinct purpose.  &#039;Actions&#039; are anything I can do right now *or* any time in the future -- they need to be done, I am not &#039;waiting on&#039; anything for their completion, but they are not imperative.  &#039;Next Actions,&#039; on the other hand, I need to complete ASAP.

So every email, from the time it arrives until the time it is deleted/archived, is an action, by nature of the fact that *something* needs to be done to it and that something requires me to act upon it.  I agree that forcing the Action label onto every new email would be a problem, because that would remove any previously applied Status (Next, Waiting on, etc).  However, Gmail ALREADY provides a built-in Action status -- when an email arrives, it is placed at the top of the Inbox, and it is highlighted.  It&#039;s placement and it&#039;s new-message highlighting tell me that an Action is required (I need to at least open it and read it).

Personally, I would like to do away with both the &#039;Action&#039; and &#039;Next Action&#039; statuses.  Instead, GTDInbox would FORCE new-message highlighting for every email that is not Trash, Spam or Finished.  Next Actions can be Starred.  Clicking Finished will remove the Star (as GTDInbox used to behave) and/or new-message highlighting and auto-archive the finished message.  In other words, even if you open an email, read it, and return to the Inbox, the message will appear UNREAD, which is an easy to see indication that an Action is still required, without having to scan the labels, which can get crowded, for what type of action it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(NOTE: most of this post is just background or rational, you can safely skip to the last paragraph for the important part)</p>
<p>I have to disagree with the first poster, zalkind, in that every email that comes into the Inbox is an Action &#8212; you have to open it and read it, then decide how to categorize it, archive it or delete it, THAT is an action.  More on this in a minute . . .</p>
<p>When I first started using GTDInbox a little over two years ago, there was no &#8216;Next Action&#8217; label.  Instead, Next Actions were indicated by use of the Star.  I found this to be very convenient and intuitive &#8212; the star is easy to add and remove (even from the Inbox), it is very visible, and, in keeping with the point of the star in the first place, it readily indicates the important nature of the email or it&#8217;s contents.</p>
<p>To me, both &#8216;Action&#8217; and &#8216;Next Action&#8217; have an important and distinct purpose.  &#8216;Actions&#8217; are anything I can do right now *or* any time in the future &#8212; they need to be done, I am not &#8216;waiting on&#8217; anything for their completion, but they are not imperative.  &#8216;Next Actions,&#8217; on the other hand, I need to complete ASAP.</p>
<p>So every email, from the time it arrives until the time it is deleted/archived, is an action, by nature of the fact that *something* needs to be done to it and that something requires me to act upon it.  I agree that forcing the Action label onto every new email would be a problem, because that would remove any previously applied Status (Next, Waiting on, etc).  However, Gmail ALREADY provides a built-in Action status &#8212; when an email arrives, it is placed at the top of the Inbox, and it is highlighted.  It&#8217;s placement and it&#8217;s new-message highlighting tell me that an Action is required (I need to at least open it and read it).</p>
<p>Personally, I would like to do away with both the &#8216;Action&#8217; and &#8216;Next Action&#8217; statuses.  Instead, GTDInbox would FORCE new-message highlighting for every email that is not Trash, Spam or Finished.  Next Actions can be Starred.  Clicking Finished will remove the Star (as GTDInbox used to behave) and/or new-message highlighting and auto-archive the finished message.  In other words, even if you open an email, read it, and return to the Inbox, the message will appear UNREAD, which is an easy to see indication that an Action is still required, without having to scan the labels, which can get crowded, for what type of action it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Methodology: What is an &#8220;Action&#8221;? by Gamelux</title>
		<link>http://blog.gtdinbox.com/2010/02/26/methodology-what-is-an-action/comment-page-1/#comment-5331</link>
		<dc:creator>Gamelux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.gtdinbox.com/?p=347#comment-5331</guid>
		<description>I would definitely pay $$$ for that!

The filter I can&#039;t do but would like to is something like this:

Show me all emails labeled with S/Action, for which its project (its label J/...) has no emails labeled S/NextAction   (for me NextAction is strictly GTD, it is the action that pushes forward a project, all others are sub-goals of the project). So what I want is a quick way to review all actions of projects that has no next action, i.e., which project should be moved forward?

Would something like this would ever be possible in GTDInbox?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would definitely pay $$$ for that!</p>
<p>The filter I can&#8217;t do but would like to is something like this:</p>
<p>Show me all emails labeled with S/Action, for which its project (its label J/&#8230;) has no emails labeled S/NextAction   (for me NextAction is strictly GTD, it is the action that pushes forward a project, all others are sub-goals of the project). So what I want is a quick way to review all actions of projects that has no next action, i.e., which project should be moved forward?</p>
<p>Would something like this would ever be possible in GTDInbox?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.267 seconds -->
